Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security
Our ideas about national security have changed radically over the last five years. It has become a political tool, a "wedge issue," a symbol of pride and fear. It is also the one issue above all others that can make or break an election. And this is why the Democratic Party has been steadily losing power since 2001. In Hard Power, Michael O'Hanlon, an expert on foreign policy at the Brookings Institution, and Kurt Campbell, an authority on international security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explain how the Democrats lost credibility on issues of security and foreign policy, how they can get it back--and why they must. They recall the successful Democratic military legacy of past decades, as well as recent Democratic innovations--like the Homeland Security Office and the idea of nation-building--that have been successfully co-opted by the Republican administration. And, most importantly, they develop a broad national security vision for America, including specific defense policies and a strategy to win the war on terror.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Its the War Stupid Why National Security Is the Essential Electoral Issue
Irag The Myth of Republican Superiority and the Future
Managing the Military
Homeland Security Taking It to the Next Level
Winning the Long War
The Real Triple Threat Energy and Security Global Climate Change and Terrorist Financing
Other editions - View all
accessed addition allow American approach armed Army Asia attacks become better billion Brookings budget build Bush administration campaign candidate challenges China Chinese Clinton continue costs create critical dangerous deal defense democracy Democrats Department develop East economic effective efforts election energy example fact forces foreign foreign policy fuel future George given global greater groups homeland ideas important improve increase initiative Institute Iran Iraq Iraqi Islamic issues Kurds leaders least less major March matters means Michael military mission national security national-security North Korea nuclear Office operations party percent planning political possible President prevent problem produce progress protect recent region Relations remains Report Republicans require response result role Senator stabilization strategy strong successful terrorism terrorist threat tion troops types United Washington weapons