Health in the Headlines: The Stories Behind the Stories

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, 1991 - Environmental health - 249 pages
0 Reviews
Reporting on health risks is rarely simple and straightforward. Scientific findings are often complex and ambiguous. Even researchers may disagree on their import. Relatively few journalists have special training in science or medicine. Sources of information are often biased, and there is constant pressure to convert dry, technical material into compelling, readable stories. No wonder reporters sometimes exaggerate or otherwise misinterpret the risks, or overemphasize the emotional side of scientific stories, or unwittingly introduce inaccuracies or make important omissions. All this leaves us--the newspaper reader or TV viewer--with many unanswered questions: Is borderline cholesterol a significant health risk? Has global warming already started? Is Alar a serious threat? Is it really dangerous to live near a nuclear reactor?
In Health in the Headlines, Stephen Klaidman illuminates the tangle of science, politics, and economics that often obscures health reporting, focusing on seven major stories: EDB, radon, nuclear power, the greenhouse effect, AIDS, cholesterol, and smoking. In each section, Klaidman vividly recounts how the story developed and evaluates how the press performed. In the chapter on AIDS, for instance, he traces the story from the first reports by the CDC and the early articles by The Los Angeles Times and The New York Times, to the dramatic increase in coverage following Rock Hudson's death. Klaidman finds that the science coverage of the AIDS crisis was highly competent, but the coverage of the human story and especially the political story (the Reagan Administration's inadequate funding of AIDS research, despite calling it their "number one health priority") was generally poor--on the rare occasion when they covered the story at all, most reporters uncritically accepted the Administration's side over that of AIDS activists (who were predominantly gay). Throughout the book, Klaidman provides illuminating insights into health-care reporting and he issues numerous caveats. He points out, for instance, that while reporters sometimes exaggerate health risks (such as at Love Canal), the very real threat posed by radon has been underplayed by the press, partly because there is no industry or government agency to cast as villain. And he warns that visual images used to dramatize a story may also skew it: an extremely rare side-effect of a drug, when featured on TV, leads to distorted gut-level conclusions about risk.
Every day we hear news on cholesterol, asbestos, global warming--stories that are not only upsetting, but frequently confusing. Health in the Headlines gives us the insight to make more sense of these daily reports, so that we can better assess our risks and make more informed judgments.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

HEALTH IN THE HEADLINES: The Stories Behind the Stories

User Review  - Jane Doe - Kirkus

Is health-risk reporting hazardous to your health? Quite possibly, according to former journalist Klaidman, now a research fellow at Georgetown, who here casts a critical eye on how the news media ... Read full review

Health in the headlines: the stories behind the stories

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Klaidman, a Fellow at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown, does a workmanlike job of examining media coverage of health risks both real and imagined. However, his thesis--that the press ... Read full review

Contents

Knowing When to Be Afraid
3
How EDB Spoiled Bill Ruckelshauss Christmas
23
A Tale of Two Towns
52
Copyright

7 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

Media and Health
Clive Seale
Limited preview - 2002
All Book Search results »

About the author (1991)


About the Author:
Stephen Klaidman, a Fellow at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, was a journalist for twenty-three years with The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the International Herald Tribune.

Bibliographic information