What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
ANITCOMPETITIVE TENDENCIES AND ANTITRUST
2 other sections not shown
administration's proposed administrative aggressive Ann Arbor antitrust laws attractive basis beneficiaries benefit coinsurance competing HMOs competition comprehensive health planning Congress consumer's copayment cost cost-consciousness coverage decision makers domination Duke University earn economic effect efficiency employees ethical exclusion exclusionary federal fee-for fee-for-service medicine fee-for-service sector FHIP for-profit HMOs functioning Gerontology The University group practice plans health care marketplace health care system health insurance industry health services HMO development HMO formation HMO-type HMO's hospital services important incentive Institute of Gerontology investments legislation market for health market forces market-oriented system Medicaid medical profession medical societies Medicare amendments monopolistic natural monopoly needed nonprofit sector organized overeconomizing patients perhaps physicians policy makers poor potential preempting premiums prepaid group practice price controls profession's profit protect proxy-shopping purchase reason regulation regulatory reinsurance restrictive risk Sherman Act smaller HMOs specialists subscribers subsidies substantial tendencies text accompanying notes universal health insurance University of Michigan