What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The evaluation process
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
achieved action team agency assess basic benefits cervical cancer changes Chapter comparison group concerned concurrent validity content validity control group convergent validity correlation cost-benefit analysis costs data collection decision-makers decisions delivery discriminant validity education program evaluation design evaluation research evaluation team example existing experimental extroversion factors goals gram health education health program evaluation health services health status hospital hypertension impact important increase indicate individuals interaction internal validity intervention interview involved issues level of measurement measure ment mental health methadone methods multiple organization outcomes Pap smears particular patients percent physical health planners policy research possible posttest pretest pretest-posttest problems program administrators program effects program implementation program objectives program operation program results quasi-experimental questionnaires questions random random allocation regression relationships relevant reliability and validity sample scores selection specific strategies threats to internal tion treatment and control treatment group women