"Here, the people rule": a constitutional populist manifesto
"What a breath of fresh air! Anyone who thinks a constitutional court must be conceived solely in terms of restraining popular impulse and containing the passions of the masses will have to think again after reading Parker's provocative books which makes a very eloquent plea for assigning to courts and constitutions the very difficult mission of unleashing political energy and stimulating public participation in civic life." -Laurence H. Tribe, Harvard University Law School "Even those of us who disagree with some of Parker's arguments should welcome his central point: that it is neither desirable nor possible in a democracy to find permanent bypasses around public opinion on the most important issues." -U.S. Representative Barney Frank "Though I didn't concur with all of it, this is the most provocative book on law and politics in a long time." -U.S. Representative Mel Reynolds "Much of this book is downright fun to read-a rarity in legal scholarship. Parker's main theme-that we need to rediscover constitutional law's populist/majoritarian nature and possibilities-is both provocative and supremely important." -Akhil Amar, Yale Law School "This book deserves to be read, reread, and reread again. Its logic and fundamental understanding of the purpose of constitutional law will persuade, challenge, or infuriate readers. But Parker's words will linger and his book will sow an intellectual revolution grounded in the experience and sensibilities of citizens. Oligarchs, plutocrats, sophists, and practitioners of noblesse oblige beware: your controlling processes stand exposed by a profoundly illuminating mind." -Ralph Nader
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
active Anti Anti-Populist sensibility argu assert assumptions attitudes audience basic beach Bickel Bruce Ackerman calls claim cliches constitutional argument constitutional discourse constitutional law constitutional theory course criticism crowd democracy discourse of constitutional dissenting double take effect elites energy of ordinary engagement ergy evoke fascism Felix Frankfurter fetishism focus freedom getic Grand Hotel idea ideal imagine inflation ink blot test insulation involves issues judges judicial judicial review Lochner Magician majoritarian majority of ordinary manipulate Mann's narrator Mario ment narrator's nary political energy opinion opposed ordi ordinary energy ordinary political energy passivity Past of Constitutional patriotic peace political actors political participation Populist sensibility prejudice presumptive respect promote majority rule question rator reason reinvigorated majority reorientation says scorn second take sial simply sketch social sort speech stitutional story supra note 35 takes on ordinary talk tend Think of Cipolla tion tional Torre turn well-educated young