Housing homeless persons: administrative law and the administrative process
The homelessness legislation has prompted a vast amount of litigation; its many discretionary terms are encrusted with a substantial growth of case law. This work examines the extent to which such case law affects the way in which the act is implemented by local authorities. Do government administrators take any notice of administrative law? Do courts control the behavior of local authorities? The author suggests the answer to both questions is "no", a situation which has serious implications for both the legality and legitimacy of the government process.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Legal Control of Administrative Discretion?
Welfare Rights Law and Discretion Revisited
1 other sections not shown
accepted accommodation Act's advice allocation appeared applicant's approach Area Office assistance Audit Commission authority's behaviour bill's Broxbourne cants cation cent central government Centre's Chapter Code concerned connection considered council housing council tenants councillors courts decisions deputy manager Director DoE's domestic violence Duncan and Evans/DoE Eastern Eastern's HPU entitlement eviction evidence homeless applicants homeless persons homelessness legislation hostel Housing Act 1988 housing advisers Housing Centre HPU's Hugh Rossi ibid implementation initial intentional intentionally homeless interpretation investigations issue judicial review Labour landlord less liaison officers Lord Denning ment Midland Midland's Housing NALGO obligations offer parents permanent rehousing priority need private rented private sector problem procedures public housing Puhlhofer reasons rent arrears response Robin Cook senior officers Similarly social solicitor statutory subsequent substantive suggested temporary three authorities tion ultra vires vulnerable welfare Western Western's officers Woodley Park