What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
BACKGROUND PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS
2 other sections not shown
1,830 beneficiaries involuntarily 85 or Older A4.9 in Appendix African American AGE1 arrangement is indicated Barents Group analysis beneficiaries involuntarily terminated beneficiaries reported beneficiaries who reported beneficiary characteristics change specialists chi-square test compare within-subgroup differences Coverage Arrangement Based differences in proportions disenrollees disruption due to cost Employer Medicare Experiences with Medicare Family Foundation-sponsored Survey filling a prescription former HMO Health Status Excellent/very Hispanic HMO Options HMO withdrew HMOs available insurance arrangement January joined another HMO Kaiser Family Foundation Kaiser Family Foundation-sponsored logistic regression market characteristics Medicaid Medicare beneficiaries Medicare market Medicare Only Other/Unsure Medicare risk HMO Medigap coverage multivariate nationally representative sample Non-Hispanic White NS Significant percent of beneficiaries Percent of disenrolled personal doctor premiums for supplemental prescription drug coverage REGC returned to traditional share of beneficiaries Significant NA NS Significant NS Source statistically significant supplemental benefits supplemental coverage Survey of Experiences Tables A4.1 traditional Medicare under-age-65 disabled Westat