Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement
Proposals to make us smarter than the greatest geniuses or to add thousands of years to our life spans seem fit only for the spam folder or trash can. And yet this is what contemporary advocates of radical enhancement offer in all seriousness. They present a variety of technologies and therapies that will expand our capacities far beyond what is currently possible for human beings. In Humanity's End, Nicholas Agar argues against radical enhancement, describing its destructive consequences. Agar examines the proposals of four prominent radical enhancers: Ray Kurzweil, who argues that technology will enable our escape from human biology; Aubrey de Grey, who calls for anti-aging therapies that will achieve "longevity escape velocity"; Nick Bostrom, who defends the morality and rationality of enhancement; and James Hughes, who envisions a harmonious democracy of the enhanced and the unenhanced. Agar argues that the outcomes of radical enhancement could be darker than the rosy futures described by these thinkers. The most dramatic means of enhancing our cognitive powers could in fact kill us; the radical extension of our life span could eliminate experiences of great value from our lives; and a situation in which some humans are radically enhanced and others are not could lead to tyranny of posthumans over humans.
What people are saying - Write a review
Chapter 2 Radical Enhancement and Posthumanity
Chapter 3 The Technologist Ray Kurzweil and the Law of Accelerating Returns
Chapter 4 Is Uploading Ourselves into Machines a Good Bet?
Chapter 5 The TherapistAubrey de Greys Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence
Chapter 6 Who Wants to Live Forever?
Other editions - View all
accelerating returns achieve advocates of radical Alzheimer’s argue artificial intelligences Aubrey de Grey become better bioconservatives biological brains biological species biological species concept Bostrom and Ord cancer capacity chapter Citizen Cyborg clones cognitive enhancement computers conscious consequences consequentialists cryonics currently Cybermen death democratic transhumanism disease dominant moral codes Ending Aging example existence existential prejudice experiences Fukuyama future genetic Grey’s Hughes Hughes’s human species human values human–posthuman societies Ibid imagine implants indefinite life spans interests law of accelerating lives longevity escape velocity machine minds movie nanobots Neanderthals negligible senescence negligibly senescent neural code neurons neuroprostheses Nick Bostrom one’s performances philosophical possible posthuman potential predict present radical enhancement radical intellectual enhancement rational Ray Kurzweil reason rejuvenation therapies scientists Searle Searle’s SENS significant simulation Singularity species-relativism status quo bias stem cell strong AI super-intelligent Suppose telomerase telomerase gene theory there’s tion Transhumanist unlikely uploading