Identifying the Aggressor Under International Law: A Principles Approach
This book deals with the identification of the aggressor state under International Law. This issue raises a deceptively easy question, that is, how does one distinguish the aggressor state from the victim state in situations involving the unilateral use of force? In a straightforward situation where state A attacks state B without any provocation, it is clear that state A is the aggressor. However, confusion begins to arise when state A first attacks state B as a form of 'anticipatory' self-defence; or when state A first attacks state B as a form of 'pre-emptive' self-defence; or when state A attacks state B in order to prevent state B from committing gross human rights atrocities against its own nationals. In all of these latter situations, the current rules are unclear and therefore either make it impossible to distinguish between the aggressor state and the victim state or give the aggressor state an unfair advantage over the victim state. This book utilizes general principles of Criminal Law in an attempt to tackle these questions and ultimately to devise a solution for distinguishing between the aggressor and the victim state regardless of the circumstances. Attention has also been given to the field of international relations.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Abiew act of aggression aggressor under International anticipatory self-defence armed attack armed forces Article 51 Assembly authority basis Caroline test Charter collective security collective security system conflict constitute context Crime of Aggression criminal law declaration defence of necessity Dinstein doctrine Dudley and Stephens Eritrea evidence example fact factors human rights humanitarian inter humanitarian intervention Ibid identifying the aggressor imminence India instance International Criminal International Law international peace Iraq's Iraqi Israel Israeli Journal of International justified Karoubi Kosovo Kuwait Law Review League of Nations missiles necessity principle North Korea nuclear weapons Nuremberg Oxford Pakistan peace and security permanent members pre-emptive proportionality reactor refugees relation reprisals requirement resolution response right of self-defence Saddam Security Council self-defence framework Self-Defense Soviet Union statement strike rule territory threat Tribunal troops UN Charter UN Security Council United Kingdom United Nations University Press victim vis-a-vis weapons of mass whilst WMDs World York