Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics, and Public Policy

Front Cover
University of Chicago Press, Jan 15, 1997 - Law - 287 pages
0 Reviews
Major approaches to law and public policy, ranging from law and economics to the fundamental rights approach to constitutional law, are based on the belief that the identification of the correct social goals or values is the key to describing or prescribing law and public policy outcomes. In this book, Neil Komesar argues that this emphasis on goal choice ignores an essential element—institutional choice. Indeed, as important as determining our social goals is deciding which institution is best equipped to implement them—the market, the political process, or the adjucative process.

Pointing out that all three institutions are massive, complex, and imperfect, Komesar develops a strategy for comparative institutional analysis that assesses variations in institutional ability. He then powerfully demonstrates the value of this analytical framework by using it to examine important contemporary issues ranging from tort reform to constitution-making.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Taking Institutional Choice Seriously
The Power of the Few and the Power of the Many
Transaction Costs and Transaction Benefits
The Structure and Scale of Justice
Safety Tort Law and Tor t Reform
Constitutional Law and Constitution Making
The Contours of Judicial Review
Propositions Audiences and Reformations
Author Index

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information