Imperial Rule

Front Cover
Alekseĭ I. Miller, Alfred J. Rieber
Central European University Press, 2004 - History - 212 pages
0 Reviews
Renowned academics compare major features of imperial rule in the 19th century, reflecting a significant shift away from nationalism and toward empires in the studies of state building. The book responds to the current interest in multi-unit formations, such as the European Union and the expanded outreach of the United States. National historical narratives have systematically marginalized imperial dimensions, yet empires play an important role. This book examines the methods discerned in the creation of the Habsburg Monarchy, the Ottoman Empire, the Hohenzollern rule and Imperial Russia. It inspects the respective imperial elites in these empires, and it details the role of nations, religions and ideologies in the legitimacy of empire building, bringing the Spanish Empire into the analysis. The final part of the book focuses on modern empires, such as the German "Reich." The essays suggest that empires were more adaptive and resilient to change than is commonly thought.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

The Empire and the Nation in the Imagination of Russian Nationalism
9
Imperialism and Nationalism in the Era of Empires
27
Positioning Modern German History on the Map of European Empires
47
LEGITIMACY AND IMPERIAL RULE
67
The Habsburg Monarchy and Beyond
69
Sects State Authority and Meanings of Religious Toleration in Imperial Russia
83
Policies of Conversion and Apostasy
107
CORE AND PERIPHERY
131
Russian and Western Comparisons
133
a Comparative View in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Europe
151
The RussianAmerican Company as a Colonial Contractor for the Russian Empire
161
The Comparative Ecology of Complex Frontiers
177
List of Contributors
209
Index
211
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 10 - Nationalism is primarily a political principle, which holds that the political and the national unit should be congruent.
Page 207 - James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985); James C.
Page 10 - Nationalist sentiment is the feeling of anger aroused by the violation of the principle, or the feeling of satisfaction aroused by its fulfilment. A nationalist movement is one actuated by a sentiment of this kind.

References to this book

About the author (2004)

Alexei Miller is Professor of History at Central European University and formerly research fellow at the Russian Academy of the Sciences.

Alfred J. Rieber spent thirty years as Professor of History and ten years as Chair at the University of Pennsylvania before moving to Budapest in 1995 to chair and reorganise the History Department at the Central European University. Since then he has taught hundreds of students from the Eurasian borderlands. His first visit to the Soviet Union came in January 1956 followed by his participation in the first year of the cultural exchange at Moscow State University (1958 59). Over the past fifty years, he has continued his scholarly visits and travels throughout Eurasia, going as far east as the Buryat Mongol Republic. His publications include works on Soviet foreign policy, Russian social history and the comparative history of frontiers. His American and European doctoral students have published widely in the history of the Eurasian borderlands. Professor Rieber's work on frontiers has been translated into Russian, Polish and Ukrainian and he has won two teaching awards in the USA and two in Hungary, as well as a Prize from the American Philosophical Society. His scholarship has been supported by fellowships from the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation, the National Council for Soviet and East European Studies, the National Endowment for the Humanities, St Antony's College, Oxford and the Inter-University Committee on Travel Grants.