Implementation of the Ports, Access Demonstration Project Authorized by the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, and on Future Ports Access Needs: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Surface Transportation of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, October 24, 1984, Long Beach, CA.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Public Works and Transportation. Subcommittee on Surface Transportation
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - Harbors - 70 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
$58 million additional agencies Alameda Street alternative Anderson Angeles and Long Army Corps asked Association Boulevard Branch Caltrans Carson Chairman changes Committee completed Compton concerned Congress construction container continued Corps of Engineers corridor cost crossings demonstration project director district economic Engineers estimated facilities Federal Freeway freight funding future going Government grade separation growth handled Harbor hearing Heckeroth highway ICTF impact important improvements included increase Island Long Beach look Los Angeles major mayor meeting ments movement moving needs Ocean percent Port of Long PORTS ACCESS Ports Advisory Committee ports area problem proposed question rail railroad regional road route Santa Fe SCAG serve shipped Southern California Southern Pacific Subcommittee Sullivan Surface Transportation talking Terminal TESTIMONY Thank things tion trade traffic trains transportation truck
Page 28 - Demaray asked me to express his regrets for not being able to be present.
Page 5 - Corridor is a 20-mile freight rail expressway linking the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach to the national rail network at the railroad yards near downtown Los Angeles.
Page 30 - The original intent was to analyze these three plans, compare them to each other and to compare them to the no action alternative, then select the most favorable plan. Upon further analysis, however, it was determined that none of the plans were optimal, so an additional alternative was developed.
Page 31 - It will require a lead agency that would be responsible for coordinating and guiding the progress of the plan from its initial approval to the completion of construction.
Page 30 - Bay ports is uncertain, the primary needs are for improved pipeline safety procedures and additional pipeline rights-of-way. mine their effectiveness toward improving the movement of goods to and from the ports. The highway and rail...
Page 30 - Freeway to accommodate the increase in traffic projected to result from the recent and future redevelopment of the downtown Long Beach area.