The variety and pervasiveness of confidentiality issues today is breathtaking. Not a day passes without a media report on a breach of confidentiality, a claim of attorney-client privilege, a journalist jailed for refusing to reveal a source, a medical or hospital record improperly disclosed, or a major business deal exposed by anonymous sources. In Confidence examines confidential issues that arise in various disciplines and relationships and considers which should be protected and which should not. Ronald Goldfarb organizes the book around professionals for whom confidentiality is an issue of weighty importance: government officials, attorneys, medical personnel, psychotherapists, clergy, business people, and journalists. In a chapter devoted to each, and in another on spousal privilege, he lays out specific issues and the laws positions on them. He discusses an array of court cases in which confidentiality issues played an important role and decisions were often surprising and controversial. Goldfarb also looks into the criteria that should be used when determining whether secrets must be revealed. His nuanced analysis reveals how federal government practices and technological capabilities increasingly challenge the boundaries of privacy, and his thoughtful insights open the door to meaningful new debate.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
2 Government Secrets
3 The AttorneyClient Privilege
4 Medical Confidentiality
6 The Pastoral Privilege
The Spousal Privilege
abuse adversary system Amendment anonymous sources argued attorney-client privilege attorneys balance Branzburg century Charles Alan Wright church classiﬁed clergy clients common law competing confession conﬁdence conﬁdential communications conﬁdential information confidentiality conﬁdentiality agreements conﬂict constitutional corporate counsel court ruled crime criminal deemed defense disclose disclosure doctor-patient privilege doctors duty e-mail employees enforcement ethics example ﬁrst government’s HIPAA Imwinkelried Internet investigation involving John Henry Wigmore journalists judge judicial Justice lawyers lege litigation mediation medical records ment modern ofﬁcer ofﬁcials one’s parties patient people’s physician practice priest privi privileged communications problems professional Professor psychotherapy public interest qualiﬁed question rationale relationships religious reporters reveal RFID search for truth secrecy secrets shield laws Sissela Bok social workers speciﬁc spousal privilege state-secrets privilege statutes supra note Supreme Court testify tiality tion trial U.S. Supreme Court violated Wigmore