In the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, May term, 1905: Mills Novelty Company ... plaintiff and appellant, vs. W.C. Dunbar, defendant and respondent. Brief for respondent ... Quarles & Pritchard, attorneys ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
action admitted affirmative allegation amended answer announced answer Trans anti-gambling act appellant Attorneys for Respondent Baltimore Board of Police Bobbins cause at plaintiff's certainly present Code complaint conceded constable constitutionality contrary Court to pass Deem's defendant demor demurrer denials destruction devices devised dismiss District error exercise fish fourteenth amendment gambling purposes HAWLEY Idaho illegal incapable Indiana instruments of crime intended issue jurisdiction Justice Lawton ment milk morals motion for judgment nets NOVELTY ordinance outlawed owner ownership Peace permit plaintiff plaintiff's costs playing games pleadings Police Commissioners police power poses possession Preston preventing proper properly overruled property in controversy property in question record recover regarded as nuisances replevin resort rule seize and destroy seizure slot machines Spalding specification statute Steele suppression supra Supreme Court tion trial unlawful unnecessary valid vicious violation Wagner warrant won or lost