What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Toward Criminal Jury Instructions that Jurors
Effect of Particularized Instructions on Evaluation
Do Jurors Understand Criminal Jury Instructions?
A Comparison of Verdicts Obtained in Severed
The Effects of Consensus Requirements and Multiple
Biases in Trials Involving Defendants Charged with
Lawyers Predictions of Success
The Influence of Expert Testimony
Judges Verbal and Nonverbal
analysis analysis of variance appellate courts attorneys bias charge communication condition consider conviction rate correlations courtroom credibility crime Criminal Jury Instructions cues current jurors decedent decision defendant defendant's deliberation Elwork evaluation evidence ex-jurors example expectations for trial experimental Experimenter Bias expert testimony exponential growth fact factors female guilty verdicts indicate innocence instructed jurors interaction joinder joined offenses joined trial judges believed judicial influence jury trial Kalven Kerr lawyers less Loftus male mock jurors nonverbal behavior nonverbal communication ns for count overconfidence paralinguistic particularized instruction pattern instructions percent person plaintiff predict prejudice primacy effect prior conviction prior record probability of guilt prosecution questionnaire questions reasonable doubt recency effect revised instructions Rosenthal sample sentence sequential judgment significant significantly Social Psychology structions subjects suggest supra note Survey tion trial judge trial outcome trial process uninstructed variables verbal and nonverbal videotaped witness Zeisel