Insurance benefits: the costs and effects of parity for mental health and substance abuse insurance benefits
Merrile Sing, United States. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (U.S.), Center for Mental Health Services (U.S.)
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1998 - Business & Economics
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Abuse and Mental actuarial model assumptions baseline beneﬁt package coinsurance cost sharing costs of parity deﬁned disorder due to parity enrollees ERISA FFS plans ﬁnanced ﬁndings Hampshire Hay/Huggins Company health and substance health insurance health maintenance organization Health Parity Act health plans induced demand informants inpatient insurance beneﬁts Lewin Group managed care plans Maryland Mathematica Policy Research medical necessity medical/surgical mental health beneﬁts Mental Health Parity Mental Health Services mental illnesses MH/SA beneﬁts MH/SA expenditures MH/SA services MI-I/SA moderately managed Ofﬁce outpatient visits parity beneﬁt options parity for mental PARITY LEGISLATION parity mandate Parity Study Background percent PLAN TYPE POS plans predicted preferred provider organization premium increases due previous actuarial privately insured require parity Rhode Island self-insured serious mental illnesses service limits Sing and Hill small employers speciﬁc Steven Hill Study Background Report substance abuse treatment tightly managed total premium utilization management Watson Wyatt Worldwide