Insurrection: Citizen Challenges to Corporate PowerFrom uncovering major retailers' links to sweatshop abuses and revealing the deception of American tobacco companies, to questioning corporations' ties to repressive dictators, shaming food processors into selling dolphin-safe tuna and demanding that businesses stop destroying old growth forests, citizens have become far more aggressive in directly |
Contents
Section 16 | |
Section 17 | |
Section 18 | |
Section 19 | |
Section 20 | |
Section 21 | |
Section 22 | |
Section 23 | |
Section 9 | |
Section 10 | |
Section 11 | |
Section 12 | |
Section 13 | |
Section 14 | |
Section 15 | |
Section 24 | |
Section 25 | |
Section 26 | |
Section 27 | |
Section 28 | |
Section 29 | |
Other editions - View all
Insurrection: Citizen Challenges to Corporate Power Kevin Danaher,Jason Mark No preview available - 2016 |
Common terms and phrases
abuses AFL-CIO agreement American announced anti-corporate anti-sweatshop attorneys Author interview big business Big Tobacco bill called campaign challenge charter cigarette cigarette makers citizens Clinton coalition Congress consumers corporate accountability corporate accountability movement corporate power corporate rule country’s create debate democracy democratic dolphin dolphin-safe Earth Island efforts environmentalists executives factory Fast Track federal force foreign Free Burma activists free trade GATT global economy grassroots human rights Ibid investment issue labor rights lawsuits legislation major Massachusetts Mexican million MMPA NAFTA negotiations nicotine Nike Nike's officials organizations Pepsi percent Philip Morris political Populist President profits protesters Ralph Nader regulations retailers says Seattle selective purchasing laws Senate shareholder resolutions SLORC smoking social struggle sweatshop talks tariffs tobacco companies tobacco industry transnational corporations tuna U.S. government unions United Unocal vote wage Washington Post White House workers York Zarni