Intellectual Property and Theories of JusticeA. Gosseries, A. Marciano, A. Strowel Fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars address the question 'Can intellectual property rights be fair?' What differentiates intellectual from real property? Should libertarians or Rawlsians defend IP rights? What's wrong with free-riding? How can incentives be taken into account by theories of justice? |
Other editions - View all
Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice A. Gosseries,A. Marciano,A. Strowel No preview available - 2008 |
Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice A. Gosseries,A. Marciano,A. Strowel No preview available - 2008 |
Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice A. Gosseries,A. Marciano,A. Strowel No preview available - 2008 |
Common terms and phrases
appropriation argue artistic basic benefits Cambridge chapter claim compulsory licensing conception concerns conflict consequentialist considered copy copyright law copyright protection cost create creation creative creators distribution downloading economic Edward Elgar effect efficiency egalitarian Ethics example exclusive fair free riding free software free speech freedom of expression FS/OSS human gene patents ideas individual inequalities infringement innovation intellectual property law intellectual property rights inventors IP rights IPRs issue Journal justified knowledge labour Law Review libertarian liberty linguistic hegemony linguistic justice localised Lockean Lockean proviso marginal cost market failure monopoly rights moral nature needs principle non-excludability normative object one’s owner ownership Oxford patent law patent system people’s perspective pharmaceutical Philosophy political problem profit proviso question Ramello Rawls Rawlsian regulation requires restriction reward self-ownership social justice specific tacit knowledge theory of justice tion tive type-protection unfair University Press versions violation


