Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Accountability for Taxpayer Relief
Since Amtrak's inception the Fed. government has provided the railroad with over $23 billion in capital and operating assistance, including about $2 bill. in FY 1998 and 1999 from the Taxpayer Relief Act (TRA) to make capital improvements and maintain Amtrak's equip., as well as to make pay. on debt. This report discusses: how much Amtrak has spent in TRA funds and what types of activities it has funded; whether Amtrak has used TRA funds in accordance with the act; what the roles of the Amtrak Reform Council and the IRS have been in monitoring Amtrak's use of TRA funds; and whether Amtrak fully reports its use of TRA funds. Charts and tables.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
$9 million 1998 appropriations act 20 expenditures 30th Street Station accepted accounting principles According to Amtrak amended amount Amtrak believes Amtrak officials Amtrak Reform Council Amtrak reform legislation Amtrak's Treatment capital expenditures capital funds capital improvement projects Capital Projects Selected capital purposes cash account Chicago Union Station Comments costs Description of Capital determine draft report eligible enacted equipment maintenance expenses examined Amtrak's expenses incurred express service funds to reimburse GAO's high-speed rail improvements in intercity incurred and paid intercity passenger rail intercity passenger service Internal Revenue Code Internal Revenue Service investment June legislative history mail and express maintenance facilities million in TRA monitor Amtrak's National Railroad Passenger operating paid prior passenger cars passenger rail service payments provisos purchase qualified expenses Railroad Passenger Corporation Reform and Accountability Relief Act funds required Amtrak reviewed Amtrak's Secretary of Transportation Selected for Review tax refund Taxpayer Relief Act Treatment of $199
Page 32 - We conducted our review from June 1999 through February 2000 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce its contents earlier, we plan no further distribution of this report until 7 days
Page 67 - V Comments From the Internal Revenue Service Note: GAO comments supplementing those in the report text appear at the end of this appendix. COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON. DC
Page 45 - (i) the acquisition of equipment, rolling stock, and other capital improvements, the upgrading of maintenance facilities, and the maintenance of existing equipment, in intercity passenger rail service, and (ii) the payment of interest and principal on obligations incurred for such acquisition, upgrading, and maintenance.
Page 3 - 2000 The Honorable Bud Shuster Chairman, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Page 70 - GAO's Comments Comments From the Internal Revenue Service The following are GAO's comments on the Internal Revenue Service's letter dated February 8,
Page 69 - See comment 2. See comment 3. See comment 4. Comments From the Internal Revenue Service
Page 67 - 20548 Dear Ms. Scheinberg: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on your recent draft report entitled
Page 42 - initiatives that are consistent with good business judgment and designed to maximize its revenues and minimize government subsidies.
Page 27 - Amtrak reviews and approves capital improvement projects to determine that the projects qualify under TRA. However, it does not determine whether individual expenses incurred and paid are allowable under the act. We find Amtrak's lack of review of expenditures troubling because, without such a review, Amtrak does not have reasonable assurance that TRA funds are spent in accordance with the law.