Interpreting Epidemiologic Evidence: Strategies for Study Design & Analysis
Evaluating the strength or persuasiveness of epidemiologic evidence is inherently challenging, both for those new to the field and for experienced researchers. There are a myriad of potential biases to consider, but little guidance about how to asses the likely impact on study results. This book offers a strategy for assessing epidemiologic research findings, explicitly describing the goals and products of epidemiologic research in order to better evaluate it successes and limitations. The focus throughout is on practical tools for making optimal use of available data to assess whether hypothesized biases are operative and to anticipate concerns at the point of study design in order to ensure that needed information is generated. Specific tools for assessing the presence and impact of selection bias in both cohort and case-control studies, bias from non-response, confounding, exposure measurement error, disease measurement error, and random error are identified and evaluated. The potential value of each approach as well as its limitations are discussed, using examples from the published literature. Such information should help those who generate and interpret epidemiologic research to apply methodological principles more effectively to substantive issues, leading to a more accurate appraisal of the current evidence and greater clarity about research needs.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
2 The Nature of Epidemiologic Evidence
3 Strategy for Drawing Inferences from Epidemiologic Evidence
4 Selection Bias in Cohort Studies
5 Selection Bias in CaseControl Studies
6 Bias Due to Loss of Study Participants
Other editions - View all
accurate adjustment alcohol approach assessment biases biological breast cancer case–control studies causal causal inference cohort study compared comparison confidence interval confounding confounding variable considered defined diagnosed disease misclassification distortion endometrial cancer Epidemiol epidemiologic evidence epidemiologic studies estimate estrogen etiologic evaluation examined example exposed and unexposed exposure and disease exposure measure exposure of interest exposure prevalence findings given goal gradient Greenland health outcome hip fracture ideal identified impact influence interpretation less leukemia levels loss lung cancer magnetic fields magnitude markers meas measure of effect measure of exposure measures of association methodologic methods non-response null hypothesis null value observed odds ratio p-value participants pattern posure prostate cancer quantitative question random error relative risk relevant risk factors risk ratio Rothman sampling Savitz selection bias self-report serum specific statistical strata strategy study base study results subjects subset tion tobacco true unexposed group valid variable women yield