Interpreting the Rapanos/Carabell Supreme Court decision: hearing before the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Water of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, August 1, 2006, Volume 4
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Water
U.S. G.P.O., 2009 - Law - 153 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Inhofe Hon James M U S Senator from the State of Oklahoma
4 other sections not shown
acres of wetlands administrative Alaska areas Buzbee Chairman Chuck Clayton Clean Water Act Commerce Clause conservation constitutional Cook County Corps and EPA Corps of Engineers Cruden CWA jurisdiction decision in Rapanos define definition of waters discharges dissent downstream environmental Federal Government federal jurisdiction five Justices flow Grumbles guidance hydrological connection implement important interpretation interstate commerce intrastate isolated wetlands issue Justice Kennedy Justice Scalia Kisling lakes land legislative limited litigation lower courts majority migratory bird Nation's waters National navigable-in-fact waters NPDES permafrost permit plurality opinion plurality's pollution Rapanos and Carabell Rapanos decision rationale regulations remand Response rivers Riverside Bayview Homes rulemaking runoff scope Senator Chafee Senator Inhofe Senator Jeffords Senator Lautenberg significant nexus statute statutory storm water streams Supreme Court decision SWANCC decision term navigable waters tion traditional navigable waters tributaries U.S. Army U.S. Senator U.S. Supreme Court United water quality wetlands adjacent