Interstate Commerce Commission Reports: Reports and Decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission

Front Cover
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1938
 

Contents

Ann Arbor R Co v United States 281 U S 658
77
United States 292 U S 1
78
Southwestern Vegetable Case 200 I C С 355
83
Grain Case Modifications 223 I C C 235 83 93 609
93
Iron Ore Rate Cases 41 I С С 181
107
PennsylvaniaG T W Car Ferry Operation 217 I C C 531 631
122
Arizona Grocery Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co 284 U
141
Shrimp from the South to Eastern Cities
169
Smith Sales Co Inc v Pennsylvania R Co 740
173
LumberBetween Points in Official Territory 214 I С
188
Armstrong Cork Co v Pennsylvania R Co 153 І С С 189
189
Southern Kansas Millers Club v Arkansas R Co et al 289
198
JanneySempleHill Co v Cleveland C C St L
201
Quanah A P Ry Co v Atchison T S F Ry Co
205
Klamath County Chamber of Commerce v Southern Pac Co
207
Coordination of Motor Transportation 182 I С С 263 464
216
SoyaBean Mealfrom Illinois to the Pacific Coast 215 І С
225
Lustberg Nast Co Inc v New York N H H R Co
253
Atwood Davis Sand Co v Chicago N W Ry Co 136
255
New York Insulated Wire Co v New York N H H
259
Ocean S S Co of Savannah 37 I C C 422 203 I С С 155 246
267
Great West Mill Elevator Co v Chicago R I P Ry Co
293
Steel and Ironfrom Kansas City to New Orleans_
298
Fruit Citrus from Florida to North Atlantic Ports
315
Sugar Cases of 1933 195 I С С 127___
327
Straight Line Engine Co Inc v Delaware L W R Co 428
335
Baltimore O R Co v United States 15 Fed Supp 674
337
Baltimore O S W R Co v Settle 260 U S 166
345
Cincinnati N O T P Ry Co v Interstate Commerce
348
Home Oil Refining Co v Ann Arbor R Co 220 I C С 4 615
351
Fulton Bag Cotton Mills v Atchison T S F Ry Co
353
Cleveland Akron Bag Co v Wheeling L E Ry Co 93
354
Topeka Chamber of Commerce v Aberdeen R R Co
497
Interstate Rates in Missouri 181 I C C 259___ 512
512
Fresh Meats and PackingHouse Products 191 I C С 257
517
Commonwealth of Kentucky v Ahnapee W Ry Co 213
521
Rates onBristol and Norton Lines of Norfolk W Ry
529
Iron and Steel Articles 155 I С С 517 689
558
Grain in Minnesota__
608
Gravel Crushed Stone Sand etc Within the State of South
625
Delta Valley S Ry Rates 206 I C C 790 199
633
Rock Salt from Retsof and Ludlowville N Y 219 I C С 649 699
637
Montana Public Service Comm v Great Northern Utilities Co
639
Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co v Alton R Co 398
642
Du Pont de Nemours Co v Boston M R 194 І С
670
Fruit and Vegetable Packages in Southwest 211 I C C 155
672
Transportation of Explosives and Other Dangerous Articles
673
Virginia Lime Products Co Inc v Chesapeake O Ry Co 193
683
Consolidated Stone Cases 200 I C C 65 111
689
Swift Co v Akron C Y Ry Co 220 І С С 778 255709
709
General Rate Level Investigation 1933 195 І С С 5 82 144
712
Nashville Traffic Bureau v Director General 92 I C С 211__
714
Pennsylvania R Co 18 I C C 60
736
Increases in Rates Fares and Charges 41
746
Keery Co Inc v New York O W Ry Co 335
773
Texas P Ry Co v United States 289 U S 627 33
789
Grain and Grain Products 129 I C C 261 17
802
Wishnatzki Nathel v Railway Exp Agency Inc 190 І
823
WesternSouthern Class Rates__ 497
824
Little Rock Board of Commerce v Abilene S Ry Co 683
832
Wooden Boxes in Official Territory 669
844
Ex Parte No 115 223 І С C 657 See General Commodity
845
Mandan Creamery Produce Co v Northern Pac Ry Co 179
852

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 131 - Commission shall give due consideration, among other factors, to the effect of rates on the movement of traffic by the carrier or carriers for which the rates are prescribed; to the need, in the public interest, of adequate and efficient railway transportation service at the lowest cost consistent with the furnishing of such service, and to the need of revenues sufficient to enable the carriers, under honest, economical, and efficient management to provide such service.
Page 17 - That the provisions of this act shall apply to any common carrier or carriers engaged in the transportation of passengers or property wholly by railroad, or partly by railroad and partly by water when both are used, under a common control, management, or arrangement, for a continuous carriage or shipment...
Page 73 - In making any such change, adjustment, or redistribution the commission shall give due regard, among other factors, to the general and comparative levels in market value of the various classes and kinds of commodities as indicated over a reasonable period of years, to a natural and proper development of the country as a whole, and to the maintenance of an adequate system of transportation.
Page 317 - In establishing any such through route the Commission shall not (except as provided in Section 3, and except where one of the carriers is a water line), require any carrier by railroad, without its consent, to embrace in such route substantially less than the entire length of its railroad...
Page 16 - If the Interstate Commerce Commission shall be of the opinion that any such existing specified service by water other than through the Panama Canal is being operated in the interest of the public and is of advantage to the convenience and commerce of the people...
Page 815 - It is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to promote, encourage and develop water transportation service and facilities in connection with the commerce of the United States, and to foster and preserve in full vigor both rail and water transportation.
Page 73 - That it is hereby declared to be the true policy in rate making to be pursued by the Interstate Commerce Commission in adjusting freight rates, that the conditions which at any given time prevail in our several industries should be considered in so far as it is legally possible to do so, to the end that commodities may freely move.
Page 14 - When property may be or is transported from point ^ to point in the United States by rail and water through the Panama Canal or otherwise, the transportation being slonby a common carrier or carriers, and not entirely within the limits of a single State...
Page 131 - ... notice to the Commission and to the general public by publishing, filing, and posting, in the manner prescribed in the Interstate Commerce Act.
Page 747 - Upon the facts as stated, it is our opinion that the district court erred in treating the movement of the rough lumber from the woods to the milling point as interstate commerce. It is not merely that there was no continuous movement from the forest to the points without the State, but that when the rough material left the woods it was not intended that it should be transported out of the State, or elsewhere beyond the mill, until it had been subjected to a manufacturing process that materially changed...

Bibliographic information