Is Nature Ever Evil?: Religion, Science and Value
Willem B. Drees
Routledge, Sep 2, 2003 - Philosophy - 368 pages
Can nature be evil, or ugly, or wrong? Can we apply moral value to nature?
From a compellingly original premise, under the auspices of major thinkers including Mary Midgley, Philip Hefner, Arnold Benz and Keith Ward, Is Nature Ever Evil? examines the value-structure of our cosmos and of the science that seeks to describe it. Science, says editor Willem B. Drees, claims to leave moral questions to aesthetic and religious theory. But the supposed neutrality of the scientific view masks a host of moral assumptions. How does an ethically transparent science arrive at concepts of a 'hostile' universe or a 'selfish' gene? How do botanists, zoologists, cosmologists and geologists respond to the beauty of the universe they study, reliant as it is upon catastrophe, savagery, power and extinction? Then there are various ways in which science seeks to alter and improve nature. What do prosthetics and gene technology, cyborgs and dairy cows say about our appreciation of nature itself? Surely science, in common with philosophy, magic and religion, can aid our understanding of evil in nature - whether as natural catasrophe, disease, predatory cruelty or mere cosmic indifference?
Focusing on the ethical evaluation of nature itself, Is Nature Ever Evil? re-ignites crucial questions of hope, responsibility, and possibility in nature.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
according animals anthropic principle anthropocentric argue argument aspects attitudes behaviour biological bonobo Boorse causal Christian complex concept of nature consilience context correlation cosmos creation Creator culture cyborg Darwin discussion disease divine Earth earthquake Eaves Elfstedentocht environment environmental ethical evaluation evolution evolutionary example existence experience explanation expression fact function genes genetic God’s Hefner hermeneutics ical idea improve individual interpretation intrinsic Keith Ward Leibniz live means metaphors models Monod moral natural evil natural law natural selection natural theology Nature Ever Evil nature’s normative objects one’s organism original patterns Paul Tillich perfection perspective philosophical physical possible primatology principle question rational reality reason reference relation religion religious role Rolston scientists seems selfish genes sense simply social species species-specific sunspots survival teleology theodicy theology theory things Tillich tion tradition twins understanding University Press Vrije Universiteit