What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Theological Science as Researcha Historical Review
New Testament Criticism in Academic Studies
10 other sections not shown
additional minor details agreement in content Akoluthia Aramaic assumption chapter common to Matthew concept dence Deutero-Mark differences Eta Linnemann event explain eyewitnesses Figure form criticism formulation found in Mark Gospel of Mark Gospel writer Gospels of Matthew Griesbach Griesbach hypothesis historical historical-critical theology Ibid icopes Identical in Mark-Luke Identical in Matthew-Luke Identical in Matthew-Mark Identical in Matthew-Mark-Luke investigation lack of parallelism Linnemann literary dependence Lucan pericopes Luke's Marcan pericopes Marcan priority Marcan wordcount Mark and Luke Mark's Gospel material common material unique Matt Matthew and Luke Matthew and Mark Matthew or Luke ment miracle narrative order narrative sequence number of words oral original parables parallel verses pels percent of Mark proof question redaction reports scientific sections similarities Stoldt Strecker and Schnelle Synoptic Gospels Synoptic problem Testament three Synoptic Gospels tion tradition two-source hypothesis two-source theory unique material vocabulary words identical words of Jesus writing