John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme CourtLSU Press, 2001 - 511 lappuses John Marshall (1755-1835) was arguably the most important judicial figure in American history. As the fourth chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to1835, he helped move the Court from the fringes of power to the epicenter of constitutional government. His great opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland are still part of the working discourse of constitutional law in America. Drawing on a new and definitive edition of Marshall's papers, R. Kent Newmyer combines engaging narrative with new historiographical insights in a fresh interpretati. |
Saturs
Young Man of the Revolution | 1 |
Judicial Statesman in the Making Law and Politics in the 1790s | 69 |
Marshall Jefferson and the Rise of the Supreme Court | 146 |
Republican Judge as Lockean Liberal | 210 |
Constitutional Law for a New Nation | 267 |
Embattled Chief | 322 |
Conservative Nationalist in the Age of Jackson | 386 |
A Judge for All Seasons | 459 |
Essay on the Sources | 487 |
497 | |
509 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Adams American appeared argued argument authority bank believed Burr called chief justice circuit claimed Clause clear common Congress Constitution continued contract convention corporation County create critics culture debate decision doctrine doubt duty early economic effort election England English especially fact federal Federalist final followed force given hand Henry important individual institution interests interpretation involved issue James Jefferson John Marshall judges judicial judicial review jurisdiction land lawyers leading legislative legislature letter Madison majority Marbury Marshall's matter McCulloch meaning nature needed noted opinion original party political position practice president principles question reasoning republican respect Richmond Roane rule settled side slavery slaves speculators Story Supreme Court things Thomas tion treaty trial turned Union United Virginia wanted Washington York
Atsauces uz šo grāmatu
How the Indians Lost Their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier Stuart Banner Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2005 |
A Rift in the Clouds: Race and the Southern Federal Judiciary, 1900-1910 Brent J. Aucoin Fragmentu skats - 2007 |