Judging Obscenity: A Critical History of Expert Evidence
In Judging Obscenity Christopher Nowlin examines expert evidence in North American obscenity trials and reveals how little consensus there is among those who purport to know best about the nature of artistic representation, human sexuality, and the psychological and behavioral effects of reading, writing, or watching explicit sexual narratives and imagery. He demonstrates that these communities of experts are divided on such questions as, Can a novel or film be both high art and obscene? and, Is the world of heterosexual pornography categorically different from the worlds of gay and lesbian pornography? He observes that the ideas of an "average" psychological or behavioral response to a story or an image and the "community" standard of decency or tolerance are outmoded myths that elude all attempts at careful measurement. Nowlin concludes that lack of agreement among experts, for example, as to how and why some sexually explicit imagery titillates or pleases some people, while disgusting or demeaning others, can no longer be viewed simply in terms of moral, religious, or even political predilections. Judging Obscenity traces the way freedom of speech and the right to equality have taken shape within the worlds of pornographic expression and consumption and provides a historical glimpse of changing views about literature and art, as well as a critical examination of the nature of social science research in matters of human sexuality, media-response, and sexual expression.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Constitutional Backdrop for Reviewing Expert Opinions about Pornography
Progressivism and Legislative Facts in the Shaping of Public Policy
Experts and Obscenity Law American Rules and Innovations 18841990
Experts and Obscenity Law Canadian Rules and Derivations 19422000
From Sadomasochism to Child Pornography Experts Narrow Their Focus While Canadian Courts Broaden Their Horizons
Indecency Law Microscopic and Macroscopic Views of the Female Breast and LapDancing in the Dark
Other editions - View all
Adler American anti-obscenity appears argument artistic behaviour broader Butler Califia's Canadian courts child pornography community standards concern Court of Canada critical depictions Dewey effect erotica evidentiary expert evidence expert opinion expert testimony expertise female feminist film gay and lesbian gay pornography gay s/m Glad Day Bookshop harm heterosexual Hicklin test homosexual human sexuality Ibid images important impugned issue judges jury Justice kind Lady Chatterley's Lover lawyer legislative facts legislative-fact evidence lesbian pornography lesbian s/m lesbian sexual literary Little Sister's trial lsbae Malamuth male matters Miller test moral obscenity obscenity law observes Ontario opinion evidence paedophiles perhaps political postmodern art Proceedings at Little prosecution psychological question regarding relevant Ross sadomasochism sadomasochistic scene scientific sexually explicit Sharpe's social science social science evidence social science research social scientists society sociological standard of tolerance Supreme Court Testa testified tion Transcript of Proceedings Ulysses violence witnesses women Woolhandler