Judicial Activism: Bulwark of Freedom Or Precarious Security?
In this revised and updated edition of a classic text, one of America's leading constitutional theorists presents a brief but well-balanced history of judicial review and summarizes the arguments both for and against judicial activism within the context of American democracy. Christopher Wolfe demonstrates how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights" with fateful political consequences and he challenges popular opinions held by many contemporary legal scholars. This is important reading for anyone interested in the role of the judiciary within American politics. Praise for the first edition of Judicial Activism: "This is a splendid contribution to the literature, integrating for the first time between two covers an extensive debate, honestly and dispassionately presented, on the role of courts in American policy. --Stanley C. Brubaker, Colgate University
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Framing the Issue
Some Conventional Guidelines
An Alternative Approach
The Constitution and the Need for Adaptation
Judicial Review and Democracy
The Democratic Character of Judicial Activism
Democracy and the Indirect Effects of Judicial Review
Defense of Judicial Activism
A Final Word
Other editions - View all
action Alexander Bickel amendment process argue argument Bork broad Carolene Products chapt checks Chicago Choper cial commerce Congress congressional constitutional interpretation controversy Court decisions criticism debate defenders of judicial Democracy and Distrust due process clause economic effect enforcement especially example expansion fact federal Federalist form of judicial Founders Fourteenth Amendment framers free speech freedom of speech fundamental grounds Harvard University Harvard University Press impeachment important involved James Madison judges judi judicial activism judicial activists judiciary laissez-faire legal realism legislative process legislature legitimate liberty and equality limited majority Marbury meaning ment minorities modern judicial power modern judicial review Moreover opinion opponents of judicial ordinary political process political branches popular president principles problems questions racial republican separation of powers simply social Supreme Court tacit consent theories of judicial tion tional traditional views vote Wade Warren Court York