Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence

Front Cover
Giovanni Sartor, Karl Branting
Springer Science & Business Media, Dec 31, 1998 - Computers - 220 pages
1 Review
The judiciary is in the early stages of a transformation in which AI (Artificial Intelligence) technology will help to make the judicial process faster, cheaper, and more predictable without compromising the integrity of judges' discretionary reasoning. Judicial decision-making is an area of daunting complexity, where highly sophisticated legal expertise merges with cognitive and emotional competence. How can AI contribute to a process that encompasses such a wide range of knowledge, judgment, and experience? Rather than aiming at the impossible dream (or nightmare) of building an automatic judge, AI research has had two more practical goals: producing tools to support judicial activities, including programs for intelligent document assembly, case retrieval, and support for discretionary decision-making; and developing new analytical tools for understanding and modeling the judicial process, such as case-based reasoning and formal models of dialectics, argumentation, and negotiation.
Judges, squeezed between tightening budgets and increasing demands for justice, are desperately trying to maintain the quality of their decision-making process while coping with time and resource limitations. Flexible AI tools for decision support may promote uniformity and efficiency in judicial practice, while supporting rational judicial discretion. Similarly, AI may promote flexibility, efficiency and accuracy in other judicial tasks, such as drafting various judicial documents. The contributions in this volume exemplify some of the directions that the AI transformation of the judiciary will take.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence
1
A DiscourseBased Approach
7
Criminal Sentencing and Intelligent Decision Support
47
The Application of Judicial Intelligence and Rules to Systems Supporting Discretionary Judicial DecisionMaking
99
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game
127
How Best Decision Support?
185
Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence
207
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1998)

Sartor, The Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Branting, The University of Wyoming, USA.