Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant?
In the mid-1970s, as a social psychologist dedicated to the application of knowl edge, I welcomed our field's emerging interest in the legal system. I have al ways been fascinated by jury trials-something about the idea that two con ceptions of the truth were in irrevocable conflict and jurors could choose only one of them. More important, the criminal justice system is a major social force that has been ignored by social psychologists for most of the twentieth century. As I systematically began to explore the applications of social psycho logical concepts to the law 20 years ago, I experienced the delight of discovery similar to that of a child under a Christmas tree. It has been satisfying to be among the cohort of researchers who have studied the legal system, especially trial juries, from a psychological perspective. I believe we have learned much that would be useful if the system were to be revised. Hlf the system were to be revised" . . . there's the rub. As I have stated, my original motivation was the application of knowledge. Like other social scien tists, I believed-perhaps arrogantly-that the results of our research efforts could be used to make trial juries operate with more efficiency, accuracy, and satisfaction. Qver the last two decades, much knowledge has accumulated. How can we put this knowledge to work? Judges are the gatekeepers of the legal system.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
How Do Judges Decide?
Opinion Formation and Expression
Attempts to Influence Judges
The Role of the Chief Justice
Responses to Influence
History of the PsychologyLaw Relationship
THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATIONS
Other editions - View all
abortion adolescents Amendment American Psychological Association amicus briefs analysis APA's appeal appointed argued assignment attitudes attorney Baum behavior Bersoff Chapter cited claim clerks cognitive colleagues concluded Congress consider constitutional contingency theory convicted Court decisions death penalty deci defendant determine dissent draft Earl Warren effect empirical ence Epstein evaluation evidence example expert fact federal goals harassment Hardwick homosexual impact individual influence issue judge's judges judicial conference judicial decision jurors jury Justice Blackmun Justice Brennan Justice Scalia Justice Stevens Kennedy leader majority opinion Marshall McCree mental retardation minority Munsterberg noted O'Connor oral arguments persons political position president Price Waterhouse procedure psychiatrist public opinion question quoted racial reason reflect relevant ruled same-sex marriages scientists sentence sexual sions social science specific studies submitted Supreme Court justices task Thurgood Marshall tice tion trial U.S. Supreme Court values vote Warren White wrote
All Book Search results »
Modernizing the Mind: Psychological Knowledge and the Remaking of Society
Steven C. Ward
Limited preview - 2002