Judicial Review in EU Law
Judicial review constitutes an important aspect of any legal system operating under the rule of law. This book provides a comprehensive account of judicial review in EU law by assessing the vast and complex case-law of the European Court of Justice in this area and the academic opinion which has accompanied its rulings over the years. It questions the prevalent view in academic literature that the Court’s restrictive approach to allowing individuals direct access to the Community Courts, in case of a challenge against normative acts, amounts to a denial of an effective remedy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action under Article acts adopted administrative aﬀected Alpharma anti-dumping applicant’s argued Article 230 Article 241 assessment Bergaderm breach bring an action CFI found CFI held Comitology Commission 1995 Commission 2005 Commission v Council Commission’s Community acts Community Courts Community institutions Community law considered constitutes Council and Commission Court found Court of Justice damage Darmon deﬁned deﬁnitive diﬀerent diﬃcult direct concern discretion EC Law EC Treaty European Ombudsman European Parliament failure to act ﬁnal ﬁnancial ﬁnding ﬁrst grant Ibid implementing individual concern infringement interest interim measures interim relief Joined judgment judicial review justiﬁed legislative liability Lisbon Treaty locus standi Member national authorities national courts obligation Opinion paras Parliament and Council Parliament v Council Plaumann principle private parties procedure proceedings produce legal eﬀects protection rejected request requirement reviewable act rules Schöppenstedt speciﬁc suﬀered suﬃcient supra note T.C. Hartley Telecinco TFEU time-limit tion Tridimas unlawful Zuckerfabrik