Judicial Review of Commercial Regulation
English courts have traditionally held a policy of judicial restraint towards regulatory decisions in the commercial context. This book provides a critical view of the courts' deferential attitude and advocates a more intensive form of judicial review which is more satisfactory in terms of individual justice.Addressing the issue in three parts, the orthodox common law position on judicial review is first set out, demonstrating the deferential approach of the courts and highlighting the limited scope of review in a commercial context. The regulator's expertise and institutional autonomy, and the demands of administrative efficiency, all contribute to preventing the courts from interfering with the development of regulatory policies.The book then moves on to consider how current policy appears to be inconsistent with the relevant values of English public law which protect individuals from capricious and arbitrary executive action - particularly the right of the applicant to obtain an independent assessment of the validity of the impugned decision by a court which acts as ultimate arbiter of law.Setting out an alternative model based on European human rights law, the book contends close supervision is necessary over decisions which alter or determine the operation of markets in order to reach a level of judicial control that is consistent with the requirements of fairness and reasonableness in this area and with proper respect for the rights of the parties involved. This alternative approach finds its roots in the principle of proportionality, which entails a greater judicialattenuation of administrative autonomy in order to ensure that actions do not go beyond what it is strictly necessary to achieve the desired outcome.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1 Judicial Review of Commercial Regulation
2 The Orthodox Deferential Approach
3 Objections to the Orthodox Approach
4 A More Intensive Review Based on European Liberal Influences
5 The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality on UK Regulatory Law
Other editions - View all
adjudication Administrative Law adopted agency appears application argued argument Article 6(1 authority body Cambridge Law Journal challenge commercial context commercial judicial review commercial regulation Commission Community law compensation Competition Commission concerned Consequently constitutional Convention court Craig decision-maker deferential approach doctrine domestic economic effect Elliott ensure European executive exercise expertise fact Hart Publishing House of Lords Human Rights Act Ibid impugned Independent Television Commission individual interference interpretation issues judges judgment judicial deference judicial restraint judiciary jurisdiction justice Law Review legal certainty legislative legitimate expectations licence Lord Lord Denning market regulation Mergers OFCOM Oxford University Press Panel Parliament particular Price Commission principle of legality principle of proportionality protection public interest Public Law quash question reasons regulatory decisions relation relevant remedial discretion requires Rights Act 1998 role rule of law scrutiny specific statutory substantive review Takeovers third parties tion United Kingdom unlawful Wednesbury