Judicial Review Or Confrontation?
On the question whether the 1973 judgement of the Supreme Court of India in the Kesavananda Bharati case and the concept of a basic structure of a constitution necessarily create a confrontation between the courts and the legislature.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abridges according amend the Constitution amendment under Article appellant apply Article 31-C Article 368 Article 39 Articles 14 basic structure Bundestag called in question Central Legislature challenge concession Constituent Assembly constitutional amendment context decision Directive Principles dispute relating economic existing Constitution fair elections federal free and fair fundamental rights giving effect Government ground Harold Laski House of Parliament impugned law judgment in Kesavananda judicial review Kesavananda Bharati's law containing legislative liberty Lok Sabha majority mentioned in Article ninth Amendment object mentioned old Constitution opinion Pandit Nehru party passed political power of amendment prescribed President Prime Minister principles specified Proclamation of Emergency protection purpose repeal revolution right to property rights conferred Roscoe Pound Sabha securing the principles social specified in clause statute structure or framework sub-clause Supreme Court territory of India thereof transcendal philosophy validity Vidhan Sabhas violative of Articles void Weimar Republic word amendment