Jurismania: The Madness of American Law
In Jurismania, Paul Campos asserts that our legal system is beginning to exhibit symptoms of serious mental illness. Trials and appeals that stretch out for years and cost millions, 100 page appellate court opinions, 1,000 page statutes before which even lawyers tremble with fear, and a public that grows more litigious every day all testify to a judicial overkill that borders on obsessive-compulsive disorder. Campos locates the source of such madness, paradoxically, in our worship of reason and the resulting belief that all problems are amenable to legal solutions. In insightful discussions of a wide range of cases, from NCAA regulations of student-athletes to the Simpson trial, from our most intractable social disputes over abortion and physician-assisted suicide to the war on drugs and the increasingly fastidious attempts to regulate behavior in public spaces, Campos shows that the mania for more law exacerbates the very problems it seeks to remedy. In his final chapter, the author calls instead for a humbling recognition of the limits of reason and a much more modest role for our legal system.
Clearly written and laced with a delicious wit, Jurismania gives us a CAT-scan of the American legal mind at work. It reveals not only that the patient is even worse off than we imagined, but also clarifies the many reasons why.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Color of Money
The Anarchic Panopticon
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Abdul-Rauf abortion actually American law American legal system analytic answer appellate court argument assert assisted suicide ATLLA attempt become behavior believe bureaucratic called Carl Sagan choice claims complex concept conflict consider Constitution contemporary context course critical legal studies culture Daniel Dennett decision makers dispute processing system Dworkin eldila Endo ethical example fact faith finders formal legal Haagen-Dazs Hannah hence human hypertrophied ideology imagine intellectual interpretive issue John Searle Judge Birkett juridical jury law school lawyers legal academics legal equilibrium zone legal reasoning legal rules litigation logical lost items matter ment merely metaphysical mind modern moral NCAA O. J. Simpson opinion outcome owner panopticon particular Peel perhaps persons physician-assisted suicide political practice predict problems produce question rational analysis rationalist regulations regulatory relevant remains requires Richard Posner Ronald Dworkin rule of law Sawada sense simply social sort supposed things tion unicorns various