Juror response to prerecorded videotape trials: prepared for National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice, Issue 30; Issue 480
Elizabeth Robertson, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Standards Laboratory, United States. National Bureau of Standards
U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards : for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1979 - Law - 24 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
ability to concentrate accused Age of respondents attitudes Bermant Brigham Young University Bureau of Standards camera Center for Consumer Consumer Product Technology court systems criminal trial Question declared a preference diff difference between PRVTT easier to concentrate emotional for jurors Enforcement and Criminal Enforcement Standards Laboratory equipment Erie County feelings of involvement felt less involved Indiana involvement with witnesses juror response jurors to concentrate jurors with prior Law Enforcement Standards Law Review 1975 LESL less emotional live trial 73 live trial experience live trials Questions Marion County monitor Ohio percent felt preference for PRVTT PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPE TRIALS prior jury experience prior live trial prior trial experience PRVTT and live PRVTT Live trial Question 19 questionnaire Relationship between jurors respondents Declared shown in table significant difference split-screen survey questions tape techniques television presentation trials Question 18 Trumbull County type of trial U.S. population University Law Review video recording Young University Law