Jury Verdicts: The Role of Group Size and Social Decision Rule
Singapore has been a world leader in math performance for over 15 years. Bring the world-class Singapore curriculum to your students with Math in Focus. Singapore's curriculum was one of the models used to create the Common Core State Standards. Math in Focus provides complete Common Core support for teachers and students. Math in Focus teaches concepts using a concrete-pictorial-abstract learning progression to anchor learning in real-world, hands-on experiences. Problem solving is at the heart of the Singapore math curriculum and is supported with a proven pedagogy and innovative technology, including the Singapore Math, Bar Models app for iPad. - Publisher.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Group Structure and Decisionmaking in Juries
Empirical Research Prompted by the Supreme
4 other sections not shown
acquittal analysis Apodaca Args attorneys behavior Bennett certainty of guilt concluded consensus conviction conviction-acquittal ratios correct crime Davis defendant deviation differences discussion dissenters Effects of Jury Effects of Social epilog interval error evidence Experiment ference function group decision hung juries implicit independent variable interaction internal validity jury deliberations jury type jury verdicts jury's Kalven and Zeisel large juries less Louisiana majority measure minority jurors null hypothesis observed outcome participation PBARD percent person population Post-deliberation predicted present quorum juries reasonable doubt recall of arguments reduced jury reduced SDR Saks and Ostrom significant six-member juries six-person juries sized juries Sloan small juries smaller Social Comparison Theory Social Decision Rules statistical Street studies Supreme Court Table task tion total commun rate trial twelve twelve-member juries twelve-person juries Type II error unani unanimous juries Valenti venire sample votes Zeisel and Diamond