Killing and Letting Die
Bonnie Steinbock, Alastair Norcross
Fordham Univ Press, 1994 - Law - 431 pages
This collection contains twenty-one thought-provoking essays on the controversies surrounding the moral and legal distinctions between euthanasia and "letting die." Since public awareness of this issue has increased this second edition includes nine entirely new essays which bring the treatment of the subject up-to-date. The urgency of this issue can be gauged in recent developments such as the legalization of physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands, "how-to" manuals topping the bestseller charts in the United States, and the many headlines devoted to Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who has assisted dozens of patients to die. The essays address the range of questions involved in this issue pertaining especially to the fields of medical ethics, public policymaking, and social philosophy. The discussions consider the decisions facing medical and public policymakers, how those decisions will affect the elderly and terminally ill, and the medical and legal ramifications for patients in a permanently vegetative state, as well as issues of parent/infant rights. The book is divided into two sections. The first, "Euthanasia and the Termination of Life-Prolonging Treatment" includes an examination of the 1976 Karen Quinlan Supreme Court decision and selections from the 1990 Supreme Court decision in the case of Nancy Cruzan. Featured are articles by law professor George Fletcher and philosophers Michael Tooley, James Rachels, and Bonnie Steinbock, with new articles by Rachels, and Thomas Sullivan. The second section, "Philosophical Considerations," probes more deeply into the theoretical issues raised by the killing/letting die controversy, illustrating exceptionally well the dispute between two rival theories of ethics, consequentialism and deontology. It also includes a corpus of the standard thought on the debate by Jonathan Bennet, Daniel Dinello, Jeffrie Murphy, John Harris, Philipa Foot, Richard Trammell, and N. Ann Davis, and adds articles new to this edition by Bennett, Foot, Warren Quinn, Jeff McMahan, and Judith Lichtenberg.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
EUTHANASIA AND THE TERMINATION OF LIFEPROLONGING TREATMENT
In the Matter of Karen Quinlan Supreme Court of New Jersey
Majority Opinion in Cruzan v Director Missouri Department of Health selections Supreme Court of the United States
Prolonging Life Some Legal considerations
An Irrelevant Consideration Killing Versus Letting Die
Active and Passive Euthanasia
Whatever the Consequences
On Killing and Letting Die
Is Killing the Innocent Absolutely Immoral?
The Moral Equivalence of Action and Omission
Negation and Abstention Two Theories of Allowing
The Survival Lottery
The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect
Killing and Letting Die
The Intentional Termination of Life
Active and Passive Euthanasia An Impertinent Distinction?
More Impertinent Distinctions and a Defense of Active Euthanasia
Coming to Terms a Response to Rachels
Saving Life and Taking Life
The Priority of Avoiding Harm
Actions Intentions and Consequences The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing
Killing Letting Die and Withdrawing Aid
Other editions - View all
action and omission active and passive active euthanasia agent aid or protection allowing analysis argue argument baby believe benefit Bonnie Steinbock causal child claim consequences consequentialist consider course Court death decision depends distinction between killing doctor doctrine Donagan's double effect ethics fact fetus Foot Foot's G. E. M. Anscombe human imperfect duties inaction innocent instance intentional termination intervening intuitions involved James Rachels Jonathan Bennett Jones judgment Karen killing and letting life-support means merely Michael Tooley moral difference moral significance morally relevant murder negative duty negative rights obligation one's operation passive euthanasia patient permissible persistent vegetative person Philippa Foot Philosophy physician positive act positive duties possible prevent principle prolong question Quinlan Rachels reason refrain refuse Rescue respirator responsibility result seems sequence situation Smith someone Suppose things threat tion Tooley treatment Trolley Problem upshot withdrawing aid wrong