Laughing Saints and Righteous Heroes: Emotional Rhythms in Social Movement Groups
Why do people keep fighting for social causes in the face of consistent failure? Why do they risk their physical, emotional, and financial safety on behalf of strangers? How do these groups survive high turnover and emotional burnout?
To explore these questions, Erika Summers Effler undertook three years of ethnographic fieldwork with two groups: anti–death penalty activists STOP and the Catholic Workers, who strive to alleviate poverty. In both communities, members must contend with problems that range from the broad to the intimately personal. Adverse political conditions, internal conflict, and fluctuations in financial resources create a backdrop of daily frustration—but watching an addict relapse or an inmate’s execution are much more devastating setbacks. Summers Effler finds that overcoming these obstacles, recovering from failure, and maintaining the integrity of the group require a constant process of emotional fine-tuning, and she demonstrates how activists do this through thoughtful analysis and a lucid rendering of their deeply affecting stories.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
How Do Chronically Failing Altruistic Social Movement Groups Persist?
2 Thrilling Risk Attracts Involvement
3 Recovering from Failure Carves Paths to Action
4 Evolving Emotional Histories Shape Styles of Persistence
Toward a Fluid Theory of Social Organization
Other editions - View all
activist activity actors African American Afrocentric anger anticipate asked basin of attraction became Beth Blueberry boundaries can’t Catholic Worker community Catholic Worker house Catholic Worker movement centers of action civil disobedience collapse conflict continued couldn’t created cycles day-to-day death penalty death row didn’t distance district attorney’s office door Doreen Dorothy Day emotional dynamics environment expansion expectations experience failure feel felt focused goal going group’s guests He’s ideological influence intense interac interaction internal involvement Joan Joan’s laughing leaders Linda looked Lucas Marge meaning moved neighborhood newcomers Nick observed obstacles participants particular patterns perception persistence perspective political position potential processes protest pulled relationship response rhythm scene sense shifts social movement groups social organization speed stability STOP STOP’s stories strategies suggests talk temporal There’s they’re threats tion Todd Todd’s told turned understand unfolding vigil we’re yelled