Law and Science, Volume 1
Michael D. Freeman, Helen Reece, Andrew D. Lewis
Oxford University Press, 1998 - Law - 307 pages
This is the first volume of an exciting new series, Current Legal Issues, which will be published each spring as a sister volume to Current Legal Problems. The basis for each interdisciplinary volume will be a two-day colloquium held each year by the Faculty of Laws at University CollegeLondon. This first volume explores the interrelationship of law and science. Future volumes will examine themes such as law and literature, law and medicine, law and religion, etc.This book, the first volume of Current Legal Issues, explores the relationship of law and science, with a particular focus on the role of science as evidence. Scientific evidence impinges on a wide range of legal issues, including, for example, risk assessment in mental health and child abuse,criminal investigations, chemical and medical products, mass tort cases and the attribution of paternity. Science promises to reduce (or even eliminate) uncertainty; how should lawyers respond to such ambitious claims? As the civil justice process undergoes a major overhaul, this diverse andstimulating collection of essays provides a timely and thought-provoking reassessment of the relationship between law and science in general and the uses and value of scientific evidence in particular.From the Editors' IntroductionThis volume addresses the intersection between law and science, two monolithic institutions which generally compete for, but sometimes coincide in presenting, an authoritative analysis of the world. The contributors to this volume take different views as to who is the victor in this contestScience deals in objective reality; therefore it is for scientists to reveal as much as they can about reality, and for the law to determine what should be made of the discoveries. Perhaps this division of labour is too simplistic, but if it is taken as a model, it is apparent that law and scienceare bound together and that mutual understanding is essential. If this volume contributes to that understanding then it will have performed an invaluable service.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Science Reason and Tort
The Role of Scientific Evidence in the Assessment
The Environment Science and Law
a Study of the Precautionary Principle
A New Criterion for the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence?
Expert Evidence in Canadian Criminal Proceedings
The Risks and Dangers of Experts in Court
Laws Truth Lay Truth and Medical Science
Brainwashing Evidence in Light of Daubert
What Lawyers Need to Know about Science
abuse admissibility of expert analysis appear applied approach argued assessment basis Bayes beliefs Bendectin brainwashing cancer causation cause cheapest cost avoider child claims cognitive cognitive science common law concepts concerns criminal Cubillo Daubert decision defendant disease drug effect environment environmental law European example exclusionary rule expert evidence expert testimony expert witness expertise Frye human Ibid insanity insanity defence issue judges Junk Science jurors jury Kahneman knowledge Lakoff Lavallee law and economics Lewis Wolpert London Lord LUST McGhee medicinal products mental Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals metaphoric moral negligence normative opinion particular Pascoe plaintiff plutonium 239 polygraph precautionary principle probability probative value problem Product Liability proof psychiatric psychological PV/PE question radiation rationality reasonable person relevant reliability Richardson risk rules scientific evidence scientists social Society standard statistical Supreme Court syndrome Theorem theory tion tort law trial trier of fact understanding United Kingdom Wilsher