Law, Endowments, and Property Rights, Issue 11502
While scholars have hypothesized about the sources of variation in property rights for over 2500
years, it is only very recently that researchers have begun to test these theories empirically. This
paper reviews both the theory and empirical evidence supporting and refuting the law and
endowment views of property rights. The law view holds that historically determined differences in
national legal traditions continue to shape cross-country differences in property rights. The
endowment view argues that during European colonization, differences in climate, crops, the
indigenous population, and the disease environment influenced long-run property rights.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Acemoglu affect property rights Beck British common law Catholic century civil law countries common law countries contracting environment control variables deaths per thousand differences in property economic growth effect efficient empirical endowment view Engerman and Sokoloff Ethnic Fractionalization European settlers expropriate extractive colonies facilitating private contracting French civil law French legal origin Glorious Revolution government enforces laws Heritage Foundation independence indigenous population Johnson and Robinson jurisprudence Latin America law and endowment law view laws that protect legal origin countries legal systems legal tradition limit government interference Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer Muslim Napoleonic Code natural resource endowments NBER northern United numbers indicating better Papers Paul Beaudry political systems population density Porta private property rights property rights index property rights institutions Property Rights reflects property rights today property rights view protect private property Religion Ross Levine running from endowments Scandinavian civil law settler mortality rates shape property rights Simon Johnson Thorsten