Legal Ramifications of the Human Life Amendment: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session on S.J. Res. 3 ... February 28, and March 7, 1983
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983 - Abortion - 262 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abortion laws Akron allow American appropriate authority baby balance become believe blood Chairman changes child clear Committee concerning Congress constitutional amendment continue deal death decade decided decision Down's syndrome Eagleton economic effect enacted fact federal courts fetus force fundamental funding going growth hearings held holding hospital human important increase individual interest introduced involved issue judicial Judiciary Justice language legislative legislatures liberty limited lives majority matter means million moral opinion patient performed person pregnancy present Professor prohibit proposed protection provisions question reason regulate relating reported require Resolution respect responsibility restore restrictions reverse right to abortion rule S.J.Res Senator Hatch shock social statement statute subcommittee Supp Supreme Court tion unborn United Wade Wardle woman women
Page 58 - There is nothing that I more deprecate than the use of the Fourteenth Amendment beyond the absolute compulsion of its words to prevent the making of social experiments that an important part of the community desires, in the insulated chambers afforded by the several States, even though the experiments may seem futile or even noxious to me and to those whose judgment I most respect.
Page 18 - ... every written or printed card, letter, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement, or notice of any kind giving information directly or indirectly, where, or how, or of whom, or by what means any of the hereinbefore-mentioned matters, articles or things may be obtained or made...
Page 129 - There can be no doubt that our Nation has had a long and unfortunate history of sex discrimination. Traditionally, such discrimination was rationalized by an attitude of "romantic paternalism" which, in practical effect, put women not on a pedestal, but in a cage.
Page 172 - It is bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.141 136.
Page 176 - This was their majestic interpretation of the economy of the universe. This was their lofty, and wise, and noble understanding of the justice of the Creator to his creatures — yes, gentlemen, to all his creatures, to the whole great family of men.
Page 9 - States. 1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 2 of the United States of America in...
Page 176 - Yes, gentlemen, to all his creatures, to the whole great family of man. In their enlightened belief nothing stamped with the Divine image and likeness was sent into the world to be trodden on and degraded and imbruted by its fellows.
Page 176 - I should like to know, if taking this old Declaration of Independence, which declares that all men are equal upon principle, and making exceptions to it, where will it stop? If one man says it does not mean a negro, why not another say it does not mean some other man? If that Declaration is not the truth, let us get the statute book, in which we find it, and tear it out!
Page 211 - Great constitutional provisions must be administered with caution. Some play must be allowed for the joints of the machine, and it must be remembered that legislatures are ultimate guardians of the liberties and welfare of the people in quite as great a degree as the courts.