Legal Theory in the Crucible of Constitutional Justice: A Study of Judges and Political Morality in Canada, Ireland, and Italy
Constitutional adjudication straddles law and politics, legal and political theory. Referring to legal controversies in Canada (free expression), Ireland (sexual morality) and Italy (religion), this book examines how constitutional judgements rely upon unarticulated political commitments. This interaction between "law" and "morality" allows us to escape the dichotomy of natural law versus positivism in a time when judges increasingly act as moral guardians.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Going Back to Basic Norms
The Politics of Equality
7 other sections not shown
abortion accept approach argue beliefs Canada Canadian Catholic Church Charter communitarian concept Concordat considered Constitutional Court constitutional justice constitutional law constitutional order Corte costituzionale criminal criteria decide decision democratic Dickson C.J.C. dissenters doctrine Dworkin egalitarian emphasised equality Ethics free expression freedom of expression fundamental Giur guarantee Habermas harm Henchy Holocaust denial homosexual Human Rights important individual invalid involved Ireland Irish Constitution Irwin Toy Italian Italian constitutional judge judgements judicial justify Keegstra Kelsen Lateran Pacts law's legal order legal system legislative legitimate liberal democracies marriage McGee McLachlin natural law norms Norris notion nullity Oakes test Parliament particular perfectionist person political argument political moral argument positivist practical reason prostitution protection punished question racist rational intersubjective argument Rawls recognised reconstruction referred reflective equilibrium rejected religion religious role rules sexual social society Sopinka specific statute Supreme Court supreme principles unenumerated rights universalisability validity values violated Walsh