Legislative Veto After Chadha: Hearings Before the Committee on Rules, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, on the Impact of the Supreme Court Decision in the Case of Immigration and Naturalization Service V. Chadha which Found the Legislative Veto Unconstitutional, November 9, 10, 1983, February 23, 29, March 1, 21, 22, and May 10, 1984
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984 - Administrative procedure - 1236 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administrative adopted agency amendment apply approach appropriate approval areas authority bill budget Chadha Chadha decision Chairman Columbia Commission committee concern Congress congressional consider consideration constitutional continuing Court decision delegated Department determine disapproval District effect enacted established example executive branch exercise expedited fact Federal final floor function give going hearings House impact important independent interest involved issue joint resolution judicial Justice legislative veto limited major matter means measures mechanism ment Office opportunity oversight particular passed period political possible present President presidential problem procedures Proceedings programs proposed provisions question reason record regulations regulatory reorganization Representatives respect response result rule rulemaking Senate Service specific statement statute submitted suggested Supreme Court Thank tion United vote
Page 808 - This policy of supplying, by opposite and rival interests, the defect of better motives, might be traced through the whole system of human affairs, private as well as public. We see it particularly displayed in all the subordinate distributions of power, where the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on the other that the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights.
Page 808 - But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others.
Page 859 - Human experience teaches that those who expect public dissemination of their remarks may well temper candor with a concern for appearances and for their own interests to the detriment of the decisionmaking process.
Page 818 - Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 US 50 (1982), the Court invalidated a broad grant of jurisdiction to the Article I bankruptcy courts. The plurality found a danger of "'encroachment or aggrandizement' by Congress at the expense of the other branches of government.
Page 806 - Federalist is, that the consent of the Senate would be necessary to displace as well as to appoint...
Page 599 - It is but a decent respect due to the wisdom, the integrity, and the patriotism of the legislative body by which any law is passed, to presume in favor of its validity, until its violation of the constitution is proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
Page 330 - States, as may be by law required of him; to make report, and give information to either branch of the legislature, in person or in writing (as he may be required) , respecting all matters referred to him by the Senate or House of Representatives, or which shall appertain to his office; and generally to perform all such services relative to the finances, as he shall be directed to perform.
Page 654 - Committee wanted to accommodate the president in his efforts to reconstitute the Bureau of the Budget into the Office of Management and Budget, but it objected to the use of the reorganization plan process to achieve this end.
Page 292 - August 1, 1983 Dear Elliott: On behalf of the President, I would like to thank you for your letter proposing a Conference on Power Sharing in response to the recent Supreme Court decision relating to the legislative veto. The President appreciates your thoughtful comments on this important issue. Rest assured that your proposal is now being shared with White House Counsel for careful study and consideration.