What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
Validity Coefficients of Ratings of Letters
3 other sections not shown
accurately predict student active at Cornell Actual Proportion applicant asked to nominate Bierley cells clinical concerning constitutes a strong correctly predicted student counselors criterion dation Decision-makers deleted differences Education and Electrical Excellent graduate student Expected Prop Expected Proportion field of Education Frequency of Comments grade point averages graduate school achievement group correctly predicted high-accuracy and low-accuracy high-accuracy group important indicate letter of recom Letter-writer letters of recommendation low-accuracy group main diagonal major advisor MAT scores mendation mention of scholarship methods Nominate students nominate three students pre-admission interview predicted student success produced higher correlations profes Proportion of frequency rated each letter rated Weak rating the letters recommendation as predictors refused to rate Results showed Sawyer scores and undergraduate selection special committee specific letters Strong Ave student success 33 students and letters success in graduate Table Talent phenomenon tical tion undergraduate grade point University of Toledo Watley Weak Ave Weak Letter xeroxed