Litigation Logic: A Practical Guide to Effective Argument
Learning to use, and defend against, informal fallacies are the keys to effective argument. This one-of-a-kind book examines informal fallacies and features a three-page Legal Logic Flow Chart to help identify the appropriate informal fallacy and counter them. Through the flow chart this book provides two legal examples on which to practice using the chart. This book is ideal for any lawyer who wants to craft a flawless argument.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Amendment analogy appeal appeal to authority argued asked asserted attack attorney bias brackets added brackets in original Chief Justice Circuit citations omitted cited claim Clause closing argument conclusion conduct constitutional context conviction courtroom credibility crime criminal death penalty decision defendant defendant's defense counsel dissenting drug due process ellipses added ellipses in original epithets evidence example fact fair fallacy of composition fallacy of division federal footnote omitted guilty Hf CHAPTER improper individual informal fallacies involving issue italics in original judge jurors jury jury's Justice Kennedy Justice Scalia Justice Stevens lawyers legislative majority majority's meaning ment murder objection opinion parentheses added parentheses in original party petitioner plaintiff prejudicial President prosecution prosecutor punishment question reason reductio ad absurdum rejected relevant response rule sentence sovereign immunity stare decisis statement statute suggest testify testimony tion trial U.S. Supreme Court victim violation vote witness words