Living with a Reluctant Hegemon: Explaining European Responses to US Unilateralism
Living with a Reluctant Hegemon addresses a striking puzzle in contemporary world politics: why have European states responded in varying ways to recent unilateralist tendencies in US foreign policy? The United States played a hegemonic leadership role in building the post-war multilateral order but has been reluctant to embrace many recent multilateral treaty initiatives championed by its traditional European allies, such as the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, the International Criminal Court, or the verification protocol to the Biological Weapons Convention. European responses to US objections, however, have varied across these different transatlantic controversies. In some cases, European decision-makers watered down or abandoned contested treaties, whereas in other disputes, they opted for regime-building excluding the US, that is, for a strategy of non-hegemonic cooperation. How Europeans choose to deal with the 'reluctant hegemon' has critical implications for how key global challenges are addressed - and yet, the striking variation of their responses has been largely overlooked in a scholarly debate fixated on understanding US unilateralism. This book fills this important gap by studying European strategic choices in five recent transatlantic conflicts over multilateral agreements. It argues that neither realist accounts of global power dynamics nor rational institutionalist models of cooperation can fully explain why Europeans opt for non-hegemonic cooperation in some cases but not others. To resolve this puzzle, we need to combine rationalist propositions with constructivist insights about normative constraints on states' institutional choices. By developing such an integrated model, the book sheds new light on the long-standing theoretical debate about the relationship between hegemony and international cooperation.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
activists analysis anti-personnel landmines anti-personnel mines argued argument Atlanticist ban treaty Biological Weapons Biological Weapons Convention BWC Protocol calculus of treaty climate change commitments compromise concerns concessions conflicts over multilateral consensual decision-making consensus norm constraints COP6 critical diplomatic Disarmament emissions EU’s European choices European countries European governments European negotiators European responses European Union expected explained factor French German global Hague hegemonic Hoc Group Human Rights Human Rights Watch hypothesis ICBL initiative instance institutions International Criminal Court Interviews Greene issue Kaul Kyoto Protocol landmines Like-Minded multilateral agreements multilateral treaty NGO observer non-hegemonic agreement non-hegemonic cooperation Oslo Oslo Conference Ottawa Process Oxford participation Politics position problem Programme of Action proposals regime rejection Review Conference role Rome Conference Rome Statute Security Council small arms soft balancing stance Stohl third countries tions transatlantic conflicts transatlantic consensus transatlantic controversy transatlantic rivalry treaty effectiveness unilateral University Press vis-ā-vis