Lubavitchers as Citizens: A Paradox of Liberal Democracy
Lubavitchers are active in the civic life of their communities and so should be considered good citizens by advocates of participatory democracy. However, their obviously nonliberal worldview tends to elicit rancor in precisely those quarters. The notion that democratic political institutions require the support of a democratic political culture is pervasive in political theory. Many scholars treat democratic virtues and liberal values as synonymous. As a result, nonliberal groups are viewed with suspicion: if they reject liberal values, they are also seen as rejecting democratic ones. Jan Feldman focuses on a subset of Chassidic Judaism known as Lubavitch, or ChaBad, to explore this assumption.Lubavitchers make an excellent test case, she explains, because they are informed, politically active, and democratic on the one hand, yet embrace nonliberal values on the other. Unlike the Amish or Hutterites, they do not rely on rural isolation for group survival but function remarkably well in secular, urban settings. They embrace rather than withdraw from political life. Although they do not use the state to promote their worldview to a wider audience, their entry into the public realm often generates hostility and fear.Feldman does not claim that liberal values are irrelevant to democracy nor does she argue that all nonliberal groups are equally benign. "What Lubavitchers allow us to investigate," she writes, "is the common assumption that liberal and democratic attitudes are inextricably linked." Through numerous interviews in the centers of Lubavitch life in Montreal, New York, and Washington, D.C., she not only illuminates a group fascinating in its own right but also provides insights into long-held assumptions about the relationship between liberal and democratic values.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Does Democracy Need Liberals?
Chassidim History Customs Beliefs and Organization
Lubavitch and American Politics
Lubavitch and Canadian Politics
Liberalism Reason Autonomy and Sources of Self
Lubavitch Reason Intellect Faith and Obligation
Lubavitcher Women and Liberalism
according American associations autonomy Ba'al Shem Tov become behavior boys Canada ChaBaD Chassidic courts Chassidim choice citizens civic claim communitarians conception Constitution created critical rationality Crown Heights culture democracy democratic citizenship distinctive diversity enclaves equality eral eruv ethnic exercise fact freedom girls humans ideal individual institutions Interview Jewish community Jewish law Judaism kashrut Kymlicka liberal feminists liberal society liberal theorists liberal values litical lives loyalties Luba Lubavitch community Lubavitcher women male marriage mechitza Menachem Mendel Schneerson menorah minority mitzvah mitzvot Montreal moral Moshiach multiculturalism munity neighborhood neighbors neutral nomic nomic group nonliberal norms Orthodox political activism position principle public realm Quebec Rabbi Rawls reason Rebbe Rebbe's religion religious require respect role Satmar schools secular sexual Shabbat share Shemtov shluchim social spiritual Talmud teshuva tion toleration Torah traditional understand University virtues vitchers vote William Galston yeshiva
Page 203 - MICHAEL SANDEL: Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1982.