Managing the Federal Direct Student Loan Program: Hearing Before the Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, June 10, 1993
Congress of the U. S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Government Operations, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994 - Government publications - 152 pages
The House Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations met to hear testimony from leaders in government and higher education on managing the federal direct student loan program. Focus was on the Department of Education's plans to correct existing management problems of the Guaranteed Student Loan Program and implement the additional responsibilities of managing a direct lending loan program. Statements are included from the following: Robert E. Andrews, New Jersey Representative; Stephanie Bloomingdale, U.S. Students Association; Thomas A. Butts, for the American Council on Education, American Association of State Colleges and Universities, American Association of Community Colleges, National Association of College and University Business Officers, and National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges; Clarence C. Crawford, :U.S. General Accounting Office; Orcilia Zuniga Forbes, University of New Mexico; William F. Goodling, Representative from Pennsylvania; Madeline Kunin, U.S. Department of Education; Thomas E. Petri, Representative from Wisconsin; Anne Sturtevant, Emory University (Tennessee); and Edolphus Towns, Representative from New York. (JB)
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
ability accountability adequate administrative agencies allow assistance Association authorized basis believe bill billion borrowers Budget calls Chairman Chicago State University collection Committee concern Congress Congressman continue contract costs default demonstration program Department of Education Department's develop difference direct lending direct loan program ensure estimates existing federal financial aid funds grant guaranteed guaranteed loan guaranteed student loan guaranty agencies higher education House Human implementation improve included increase institutions interest issue lenders Michigan necessary noted Office operate opportunity options originate participating percent phased prepared present President problems proposal questions reason receive recent record reform repayment Representative responsibilities result savings schools Secretary servicing staff statement structure student aid student loan program subcommittee suggested Thank Towns University