Mathematics of Collective Action
"Philosophers, social scientists, and laymen have used two perspectives in analyzing social action. One sees man's action as the result of causal forces, and the other sees action as purposive and goal directed. Mathematical treatment of social action has shown this same dichotomy. Some models of behavior describe a causal process, in which there is no place for intention or purpose. Most stochastic models of behavior, whether individual or group, are like this. Another body of work, however, employs purpose, anticipation of some future state, and action designed to maximize the proximity to some goal. Classical microeconomic theory, statistical decision theory, and game theory exemplify this direction. This book examines these two directions of work, and makes original contributions to the second. An introductory chapter outlines these two bodies of work, and casts them in a common frame, to display their similarities and differences. Chapter 2 reviews at length recent work in stochastic processes that makes up the first body of work, which sees social action as the resultant of causal forces. The remaining chapters develop a mathematical framework for the study of systems of social action using a purposive theoretical base. These chapters are designed particularly to contribute to the study of collective decisions, a form of social action that has proved particularly challenging to theoretical analysis. First published in 1973, this became a significant work both in problem solving and in the future career of the author. It is of continuing importance to researchers and students interested in statistical analysis."--Provided by publisher.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action actor allocation analysis appears applications assumed assumption behaviour calculated carried causal Chapter choice Coleman collectivity committee concept conditional consequences constitutional continuous decision rule defined demand dependent described determine developed directed discussed distribution effect elements empirical equal equation equilibrium estimate event examination example exchange expected extensions external fact favour final fraction function gain given gives greater important increases increment independent individual interests introduction issue lead legislator legislature less majority Markov mathematical matrix maximization means observed occurs outcome parameters persons positive possible present principle PRINT probability problem proportion pure rationality realization of interests relation relative representing response result shown shows simple single situation social statements statistical strategy structure Table theory tion transition rates treatment utility variables vote
Page xxxi - We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'.
Page li - American Journal of Sociology 86 (May): 1203-35. . 1983. "Restricted Access in Networks and Models of Power." American Journal of Sociology 88 (January): 686-17. Merton, Robert. 1947. "Manifest and Latent Functions." Pp. 19-84 in Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. Mintz, Beth, and Michael Schwartz. 1985. The Power Structure of American Business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. North, D., and R. Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University...
Page 2 - ... Which type of explanation ought to be conceived of? One cannot avoid a confrontation with the methodology of social science. In his book on "collective action" J. Coleman stresses the difference between two separate approaches of action. The first a causal one, the second a teleological one. He says : There are two quite different streams of work in the study of social action, both of which begin at the level of the individual.
Page xiv - To develop statistical methods that quantify such causes his general approach is: "(1) to begin with the idea of a process, (2) to attempt to lay out a mathematical model that mirrors this process, and then (3) given particular kinds of data, to transform the mathematical model into a statistical model for estimating parameters of the process
Page l - Simulation and Gaming in Social Science (New York: The Free Press, 1972).
Page 2 - The two streams of work represent fundamentally different conceptions of man. The first conception explains man's behaviour as response to his environment; the second explains his behaviour as pursuit of a goal. The first searches for causal processes and determinants of behaviour, and often uses a mechanistic explanatory frame, which employs the concepts of 'forces
All Book Search results »