Measurement InvarianceRens Van De Schoot, Peter Schmidt, Alain De Beuckelaer Multi-item surveys are frequently used to study scores on latent factors, like human values, attitudes and behavior. Such studies often include a comparison, between specific groups of individuals, either at one or multiple points in time. If such latent factor means are to be meaningfully compared, the measurement structures including the latent factor and their survey items should be stable across groups and/or over time, that is ‘invariant’. Recent developments in statistics have provided new analytical tools for assessing measurement invariance (MI). The aim of this special issue is to provide a forum for a discussion of MI, covering some crucial ‘themes’: (1) ways to assess and deal with measurement non-invariance; (2) Bayesian and IRT methods employing the concept of approximate measurement invariance; and (3) new or adjusted approaches for testing MI to fit increasingly complex statistical models and specific characteristics of survey data. |
What people are saying - Write a review
Contents
Measurement Invariance | 5 |
a distinct problem in testing the equivalence of intra and interindividual model structures | 9 |
Measurement bias detection through Bayesian factor analysis | 23 |
measurement invariance and change | 32 |
crossnational investigation through traditional and Bayesian structural equation modeling | 39 |
An approximate measurement invariance approach to withincouple relationship quality | 49 |
a crosscountry illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values | 59 |
detecting noninvariant items using clusterwise simultaneous component analysis | 69 |
Testing strong factorial invariance using threelevel structural equation modeling | 126 |
Approximate measurement invariance in crossclassified ratermediated assessments | 133 |
Assessing factorial invariance of twoway rating designs using threeway methods | 146 |
The experience of traumatic events disrupts the measurement invariance of a posttraumatic stress scale | 159 |
the alignment method | 166 |
a comparison of scalar partial and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance | 173 |
an illustration with healthrelated quality of life data from thirteen measurement occasions | 188 |
use in practice | 196 |
interesting incremental information from multitraitmultimethod studies | 80 |
The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models | 99 |
Measurement equivalence in mixed mode surveys | 115 |
exact vs approximate measurement invariance | 207 |
Back Cover | 218 |