Psychology Press, 1998 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 195 pages
Do journalists have a duty to be impartial and objective? How should the public's right-to-know be balanced against an individual's right to privacy? At a time when the role and responsibilities of the media have become an increasingly important part of public debate, this text brings together philosophers, media academics and journalists to discuss the pressing ethical and moral questions faced by the media and to examine the basic notions such as truth, virtue, privacy, rights, offence, harm and freedom which underlie them. The book engages with debates about privacy and media intrusion, the ethics of political journalism, and the justification of censorship against the demands of freedom of expression.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The journalism of attachment
The problem of humbug
new militarism and
Privacy the public interest and a prurient public
the legal and extralegal protection
market moguls and media regulation
Other editions - View all
accused action argued argument behaviour Bosnian War breach British broadcast Calcutt causes censorship claim Cmnd commitments concerned context course coverage crime critical democratic depiction editor effect emotions ethical journalism evaluation event evidence example fact fantasy film freedom of speech Geoffrey Robertson Gorden Kaye gossip Guardian Gulf Halabja harm Hitler human imagination instance involved Iraq Iraqi issues journalists judgements justified kind legitimate lives London Lord Wakeham Martin Bell matter means Media Ethics medium Michael Foot moral newspapers Nigel Warburton objectivity offence perceptual realism personal information Philosophy photograph photojournalism Piers Morgan politicians pornography present Press Complaints Commission principle programmes propaganda protection public figures public interest reason recognise relevant response role Routledge Roy Greenslade Saddam Hussein self-regulation sex and violence sexual significance social society sort story structural articulations tabloid things tion truth values viewers wrong